Social mobility - Revision history

Admin at 22:19, 29 January 2020

2020-01-29T22:19:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:19, 29 January 2020
Line 12:		Line 12:
	[[Category:WY-things-happen]]		[[Category:WY-things-happen]]
	[[Category:Society]]		[[Category:Society]]
	[[Category:~~Poverty~~]]		[[Category:Reason]]

Admin at 21:57, 29 January 2020

2020-01-29T21:57:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:57, 29 January 2020
Line 12:		Line 12:
	[[Category:WY-things-happen]]		[[Category:WY-things-happen]]
	[[Category:Society]]		[[Category:Society]]
			[[Category:Poverty]]

Admin at 12:43, 19 January 2020

2020-01-19T12:43:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:43, 19 January 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Image:social-mobility.jpg\|left\|150px\|WY-things-happen]]		[[Image:social-mobility.jpg\|left\|150px\|WY-things-happen]]
	'''[[Social mobility \| Is social mobility good]]?''' <small>(26 January 2011 ([[Sector]] - <span style="color:#fa7100">why</span>)</small>		'''[[Social mobility \| Is social mobility good]]?''' <small>(26 January 2011, [[Sector]] - <span style="color:#fa7100">why</span>)</small>
	Who could argue against lifting people out of poverty, rewarding individuals according to merit, and ensuring equal opportunities for all? Surely, a more socially mobile world is a more just world. But there's a price to pay for social mobility that other ways of looking at ethics highlight. The utilitarian approach to life, associated with philosopher Jeremy Bentham, always returns to a single question - what makes for more happiness in the world? Does social mobility achieve that? Well, it might.		Who could argue against lifting people out of poverty, rewarding individuals according to merit, and ensuring equal opportunities for all? Surely, a more socially mobile world is a more just world. But there's a price to pay for social mobility that other ways of looking at ethics highlight. The utilitarian approach to life, associated with philosopher Jeremy Bentham, always returns to a single question - what makes for more happiness in the world? Does social mobility achieve that? Well, it might.

Admin at 12:43, 19 January 2020

2020-01-19T12:43:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:43, 19 January 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Image:social-mobility.jpg\|left\|150px\|WY-things-happen]]		[[Image:social-mobility.jpg\|left\|150px\|WY-things-happen]]
	'''[[Social mobility \| Is social mobility good]]?''' <small> ~~Wed,~~ 26 January 2011 ([[Sector]] - <span style="color:#fa7100">why</span>)</small>		'''[[Social mobility \| Is social mobility good]]?''' <small>(26 January 2011 ([[Sector]] - <span style="color:#fa7100">why</span>)</small>
	Who could argue against lifting people out of poverty, rewarding individuals according to merit, and ensuring equal opportunities for all? Surely, a more socially mobile world is a more just world. But there's a price to pay for social mobility that other ways of looking at ethics highlight. The utilitarian approach to life, associated with philosopher Jeremy Bentham, always returns to a single question - what makes for more happiness in the world? Does social mobility achieve that? Well, it might.		Who could argue against lifting people out of poverty, rewarding individuals according to merit, and ensuring equal opportunities for all? Surely, a more socially mobile world is a more just world. But there's a price to pay for social mobility that other ways of looking at ethics highlight. The utilitarian approach to life, associated with philosopher Jeremy Bentham, always returns to a single question - what makes for more happiness in the world? Does social mobility achieve that? Well, it might.

Admin at 12:42, 19 January 2020

2020-01-19T12:42:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:42, 19 January 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Image:social-mobility.jpg\|left\|150px\|WY-things-happen]]		[[Image:social-mobility.jpg\|left\|150px\|WY-things-happen]]
	'''[[Social mobility \| Is social mobility good]]?''' <small> Wed, 26 January 2011 ([[Sector]])</small>		'''[[Social mobility \| Is social mobility good]]?''' <small> Wed, 26 January 2011 ([[Sector]] - <span style="color:#fa7100">why</span>)</small>
	Who could argue against lifting people out of poverty, rewarding individuals according to merit, and ensuring equal opportunities for all? Surely, a more socially mobile world is a more just world. But there's a price to pay for social mobility that other ways of looking at ethics highlight. The utilitarian approach to life, associated with philosopher Jeremy Bentham, always returns to a single question - what makes for more happiness in the world? Does social mobility achieve that? Well, it might.		Who could argue against lifting people out of poverty, rewarding individuals according to merit, and ensuring equal opportunities for all? Surely, a more socially mobile world is a more just world. But there's a price to pay for social mobility that other ways of looking at ethics highlight. The utilitarian approach to life, associated with philosopher Jeremy Bentham, always returns to a single question - what makes for more happiness in the world? Does social mobility achieve that? Well, it might.

Admin at 17:42, 15 January 2020

2020-01-15T17:42:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:42, 15 January 2020
Line 11:		Line 11:
	[[Category:WHY]]		[[Category:WHY]]
	[[Category:WY-things-happen]]		[[Category:WY-things-happen]]
	[[Category:~~practical~~]]		[[Category:Society]]

Admin at 10:41, 4 January 2020

2020-01-04T10:41:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:41, 4 January 2020
Line 11:		Line 11:
	[[Category:WHY]]		[[Category:WHY]]
	[[Category:WY-things-happen]]		[[Category:WY-things-happen]]
	[[Category:~~Others~~]]		[[Category:practical]]

Admin: Created page with "WY-things-happen ''' Is social mobility good?''' Wed, 26 January 2011 (Sector) Who could argu..."

2020-01-02T08:22:31Z

Created page with "left|150px|WY-things-happen ''' Is social mobility good?''' <small> Wed, 26 January 2011 (Sector)</small> Who could argu..."

New page

[[Image:social-mobility.jpg|left|150px|WY-things-happen]]
'''[[Social mobility | Is social mobility good]]?''' <small> Wed, 26 January 2011 ([[Sector]])</small>
Who could argue against lifting people out of poverty, rewarding individuals according to merit, and ensuring equal opportunities for all? Surely, a more socially mobile world is a more just world. But there's a price to pay for social mobility that other ways of looking at ethics highlight. The utilitarian approach to life, associated with philosopher Jeremy Bentham, always returns to a single question - what makes for more happiness in the world? Does social mobility achieve that? Well, it might.

But social mobility also produces dislocation. People migrate to cities and find themselves isolated from their family, and constantly having to make new friends - relationships that might be fun but not very deep. They may be richer, but are they happier?

Link: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-12279627

Link: http://www.indymedia.ie/article/79357

[[Category:WHY]]
[[Category:WY-things-happen]]
[[Category:Others]]